Marriage of Entezari and Heravi
In this family law matter respondent (husband) appeals from the trial court's denial of his motion for relief from the default judgment entered against him and in favor of petitioner (wife). Husband claims that the default was the result of his attorney's mistake and that relief was mandatory under Code of Civil Procedure section 473, subdivision (b). Husband also argues that the relief was warranted because he was never properly served with the summons and petition and because wife had fraudulently transferred community property to herself. Court conclude that husband did not show that entry of default was actually caused by attorney error, that husband voluntarily submitted to the jurisdiction of the court, and that the alleged fraudulent transfer does not warrant relief from the judgment. Accordingly, court affirm.
Comments on Marriage of Entezari and Heravi