legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re N.Z. CA2/3
Mother M.Z. (mother) appeals from the juvenile court’s order terminating her parental rights under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26 and setting adoption as the permanent plan for her 11-year-old son, N.Z. (minor). Mother challenges the court’s finding that the beneficial parent child relationship bar to adoption (§ 366.26, subd. (c)(1)(B)(i)) does not apply. The court determined that although mother consistently visited the minor during the four years of the dependency proceedings and the two have a strong bond, the benefit of maintaining the parent child bond does not outweigh the benefits adoption would provide the minor in this case. That finding, which rests not only upon the written reports from the Department of Children and Family Services (Department) but also upon testimony by mother and the minor, is supported by substantial evidence. Accordingly, we affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale