P. v. Garfel CA2/6
Robert Garfel appeals from an order denying his petition for the recall of his 25-year-to-life sentence and for resentencing pursuant to Proposition 36, the Three Strikes Reform Act of 2012. He contends that the trial court erroneously concluded that he was ineligible for resentencing because he had been armed with a firearm during the commission of his third-strike offense: possession of a firearm by a felon. (Former Pen. Code, § 12021, subd. (a)(1), now § 29800, subd. (a)(1).) We affirm.
Comments on P. v. Garfel CA2/6