In re Z.S. CA4/2
D.E. (mother) appeals the summary denial of her Welfare and Institutions Code section 388 petition requesting another chance to have Z.S. (the child) returned to her custody. She contends that because the child’s guardians are now divorced (requiring him to go back and forth between the two households) and she is able to provide a stable home, it is in the child’s best interest to return to her care. Because we find that mother did not demonstrate any significant change in circumstances or establish that returning the child to her custody was in his best interest, the juvenile court did not abuse its discretion by summarily denying her section 388 petition. Consequently, we affirm the order.
Comments on In re Z.S. CA4/2