Goldstone v. Swan CA1/5
Sharon Goldstone appeals from an order imposing sanctions and requiring reunification counseling at her cost in a proceeding for dissolution of marriage and child custody. She contends the order should be reversed because (1) this relief was requested in a responsive declaration rather than by noticed motion; (2) the sanctions are contrary to public policy, unsupported by the evidence, and imposed without adequate notice; and (3) the reunification counseling is precluded by Family Code section 3026 and was ordered without adequate findings under section 3190. She further requests that a different trial judge be assigned to her case. We will affirm the order.
Comments on Goldstone v. Swan CA1/5