P. v. Lang
Defendant appeals a judgment entered following a jury verdict finding him guilty of possession of methamphetamine (Health & Saf. Code, S 11377, subd. (a)) and possession of cocaine (Health & Saf. Code, S 11350, subd. (a)). On appeal, Lang contends: (1) his federal constitutional right to due process of law was violated when the prosecution did not produce a police dispatch tape recording; (2) the trial court abused its discretion by admitting evidence of his prior acts of drug possession; and (3) the trial court erred by finding him ineligible for probation and drug treatment under Proposition 36 (Pen. Code, S 1210 et seq.).
The judgment is affirmed.
Comments on P. v. Lang