legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re J.M. CA4/1
K.M., the noncustodial father (Father) of J.M. and A.M., appeals from orders of the juvenile court finding it would be detrimental to place the children with him after removing them from the custody of their mother (Mother). He contends the orders must be reversed because the juvenile court failed to provide an adequate explanation for its finding that it would be detrimental to place the children in his care, as required by the applicable statute, Welfare and Institutions Code section 361.2 . We conclude the juvenile court did state some reasoning for its finding, substantial evidence supports further implied findings, and any failure by the court to adequately express its reasoning on the record was harmless. We therefore affirm the orders.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale