Braun v. Faciane CA4/1
Kirby Faciane appeals from an order denying his request to dissolve a restraining order and raises two issues here. First, he contends the trial court improperly failed to consider facts relevant to the prior order in deciding whether there was a material change in the circumstances since the restraining order was entered. Second, he argues the court improperly considered inadmissible evidence in its ruling. Neither argument persuades and, accordingly, we affirm.
Comments on Braun v. Faciane CA4/1