Parker v. Logitech, Inc. CA1/4
Plaintiff Christopher Parker appeals from the trial court’s refusal to certify as a class action what plaintiff describes as “a routine consumer-fraud case about misleading advertising and [defendant] Logitech’s failure to disclose material information to consumers before they spent hundreds of dollars purchasing Logitech’s expensive home-security systems.” After reviewing the exhaustive record of conflicting evidence before the trial court with respect to the certification motion, we cannot say that the court’s conclusion that common issues of fact do not predominate constitutes the “manifest abuse of discretion” that is required for reversal. We shall therefore affirm the order.
Comments on Parker v. Logitech, Inc. CA1/4