Knowles v. Scott CA2/7
The trial court assessed $557,236 in damages against Andrew Scott for embezzling from a company called Intelligent SCM, LLC. Scott appeals, making six diverse arguments. He claims plaintiff Alex Knowles lacked standing to sue Scott in a derivative suit. Scott likewise attacks the trial court’s finding that four members of Intelligent signed a written document that changed the company’s governance structure. Third, Scott claims that, in various ways, the evidence did not support the damages award. Fourth, Scott complains about the testimony of witness Lew Finkelstein. Fifth, Scott maintains the trial court’s charging and foreclosure orders were improper. And sixth, Scott says the trial court mishandled his crossclaim. All these arguments are erroneous. We affirm.
Comments on Knowles v. Scott CA2/7