A.s. v. Young CA3
Defendant Laura C. Young appeals from three cases in which civil restraining orders were granted to three of her then roommates, plaintiffs A.S., As.S., and M.W., prohibiting Young from engaging in harassing conduct and limiting her proximity to those roommates. (Code. Civ. Proc., § 527.6.) Only one of the three roommates, M.W., filed a respondent’s brief. The three appeals have been consolidated for purposes of argument and disposition. Young maintains the burden of affirmatively demonstrating trial court error has prejudiced her. (Cal. Const., art. VI, § 13.) We understand Young’s arguments to challenge both the availability of section 527.6’s restraining orders to roommates and also the evidentiary showing made by her roommates to obtain those orders, whom she asserts were actually doing whatever it took to make her leave.
Comments on A.s. v. Young CA3