P. v. Frazer CA5
Appellant Daniel Eugene Frazer was convicted by jury trial of two counts of first degree robbery. On appeal, he contends (1) as a self-represented, incarcerated defendant, he was denied adequate legal resources in violation of his constitutional rights; (2) the court erred when it denied his request for a trial continuance; and (3) the court erred by admitting cell phone records under the business records hearsay exception. We disagree and affirm.
Comments on P. v. Frazer CA5