Marriage of Weiskittel CA4/3
Bradley G. Weiskittel (Bradley) appeals from a postjudgment order requiring him to continue paying spousal support to Rebekah S. Weiskittel (Rebekah) for an additional five years. He contends the court’s “extension of jurisdiction over spousal support was an abuse of discretion” because the court incorrectly found the marriage was of long duration. He claims this finding conflicted with the parties’ stipulated judgment, which did not define the marriage as long term. Alternatively, he claims there was insufficient evidence to find the marriage was of long duration and the court abused its discretion by not reducing or terminating spousal support. Finally, he contests the court’s award of attorney fees to Rebekah. As explained below, we disagree with Bradley’s contentions and, accordingly, we affirm the order.
Comments on Marriage of Weiskittel CA4/3