Jiao v. Jin CA4/3
Qiuyue Jiao and Xiang Ji, mother and son (collectively, appellants), appeal from a posttrial judgment denying them relief on the complaint they brought against Jiao’s former business partner, Jin Jin, and Jin’s husband and daughter. They contend the trial court erred in concluding they failed to meet their burden of proof on their intentional tort and business-related causes of action because they presented substantial evidence in support thereof. We find no error, however, because the court’s conclusion was based on its determination that none of appellants’ evidence was credible, a determination to which we defer. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment.
Comments on Jiao v. Jin CA4/3