Bustillos v. County of Shasta CA3
Procedurally, this case is sui generis. Plaintiff Steven Bustillos was employed as an investigator for defendant Shasta County in its prosecutor’s office (the prosecutor’s office is included as a redundant defendant as well). In November 2015, Bustillos was served with notice of an adverse action based on his dishonesty (the details of which are not clear from the petition). In June 2016, defendant Shasta County Employee Appeals Board (Board) upheld a suspension without pay as discipline. Bustillos “admittedly” never sought judicial review of the Board’s decision within the 90-day limitations period. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1094.6, subd. (b).)
Comments on Bustillos v. County of Shasta CA3