P. v. Reed CA3
A jury found defendant Charles Christopher Reed guilty of arson of a structure and forest land. On appeal, he challenges certain statements the trial court made to the jury pool. He maintains the statements watered down the burden of proof to something close to a preponderance of the evidence. We conclude the trial court’s comments during jury selection did not lessen the requirement of proof beyond a reasonable doubt. We affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Reed CA3