Guardianship of M.P. CA4/2
Minor, M.P., suffers from cerebral palsy, asthma, and a seizure disorder. M.P.’s mother, A.H. (mother), died in August 2016. After mother’s death, M.P.’s maternal grandmother, petitioner and respondent, T.H. (grandmother), petitioned the probate court for appointment as M.P.’s guardian. The court granted grandmother’s guardianship petition over the objection of M.P.’s father, objector and appellant, Mi.P. (father). Father contends that the court erred in determining grandmother was a de facto parent, and that the court should have obtained a report and recommendation on the guardianship petition from the regional center. He also argues that the probate court erroneously failed to communicate with the court in Kern County, where the parents had a family law case, about the proper venue. Lastly, he contends that the court erred in failing to consider two of his filings as evidence at the guardianship hearing. We affirm.
Comments on Guardianship of M.P. CA4/2