In re Justin H.
The mother of dependent child minor, appeals two orders made by the trial court at a six-month dependency review hearing. (Welf. & Inst. Code, S 366.21, subd. (e).) She claims that it was an abuse of discretion for the trial court to order a psychological evaluation, that any psychological evaluation should have been ordered to be performed in Montana, and that there was insufficient evidence to support the protective order the court issued. Court affirm.
Comments on In re Justin H.