Pamela D. v. Sup. Ct.
n October 2006, the juvenile court denied reunification services for petitioner and set a February 22, 2007 date for a permanency planning hearing in a dependency matter involving minor F.D. (See Welf. & Inst. Code, S 366.26.) Petitioner petitions for review of these orders, asking us to issue a writ of mandate directing the juvenile court to vacate the orders denying her reunification services and setting a permanency planning hearing. She asks us to order the juvenile court to require that reunification services be provided to her and seeks a stay of the permanency planning hearing. She contends that the juvenile court erred when it found that statutory provisions barring the provision of reunification services applied. (See S 361.5, subd. (b)(10) (11).) Real party in interest Contra Costa County Department of Children and Family Services opposes the petition. Court deny the petition on the merits.
Comments on Pamela D. v. Sup. Ct.