P. v. Romero
Appellant was convicted of second degree murder. On appeal, he contends that the trial court erred in (1) declining to instruct the jury on voluntary manslaughter; (2) making references to felony murder in the jury instructions, and (3) instructing the jury that it could consider appellant's initial false statements to the police as evidence of consciousness of guilt. Court find the first and second asserted errors to have been harmless, and reject appellant's claim of error as to the third. Accordingly, court affirm.
Comments on P. v. Romero