In re Andrew D.
Andrew D., Sr., appeals from an order terminating his parental rights (Welf. & Inst. Code,S 366.26) to his namesake son. Appellant joins in the argument advanced by the child's mother in her appeal, In re Curtice B. et al. (case No. F050905). The mother challenged the trial court"s rejection of her argument that termination would be detrimental to Andrew and his half brother based on their relationship with her. Having reviewed the appellate record, we concluded the trial court could properly find there was no compelling reason to find termination of parental rights would be detrimental to the children. (In re Celine R. (2003) 31 Cal.4th 45, 53.)
Because the father in his appeal raised no independent claim of error, we conclude the court properly terminated his parental rights.
Comments on In re Andrew D.