In re H.R. CA2/2
Thomas E. Montgomery, County Counsel, Caitlin E. Rae, Chief Deputy County Counsel, and Tahra Broderson, Senior Deputy County Counsel, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
M.P. (Mother) appeals from the order terminating her parental rights and selecting adoption as the permanent plan for her daughter, H.R. Mother contends that the juvenile court erred by terminating parental rights after finding that the beneficial parent-child relationship exception to adoption did not apply. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.26, subd. (c)(1)(B)(i).) She also challenges the juvenile court’s actions to satisfy its duty of inquiry under the Federal Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA). We conclude that the juvenile court did not err in making these rulings and therefore affirm.
Comments on In re H.R. CA2/2