In re A.M.
Appellant is the father of minor. At a hearing held pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26, the juvenile court terminated father's parental rights to A. On appeal, he asserts that the court failed to comply with the notice requirements of the Indian Child Welfare Act (the ICWA) and California Rules of Court, rule 1439. Court hold that there was no violation of the ICWA. To the extent that the requirements of rule 1439 were not met, court find that any error was harmless. Accordingly, court affirm.
Comments on In re A.M.