legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Jacobs v. Pritz CA2/8
After his car was struck by another car, Kenneth Jacobs filed a negligence action against Dana Lynn Pritz, an insured person on the other car. Shortly after the statute of limitations ran, Jacobs named Rachel Ann Pritz, apparently Dana’s daughter and the other car’s driver, as a defendant in his first amended complaint through a “Doe” amendment. Jacobs subsequently filed an “incorrect name” amendment to his first amended complaint substituting Rachel for Dana as the only named defendant, asserting he had incorrectly named Dana rather than Rachel. Relying on the statute of limitations, Rachel moved for summary judgment and demurred to the incorrect name amendment. The trial court granted the summary judgment motion and sustained the demurrer. Jacobs appeals and we affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale