legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Anderson CA2/8
Donald Edward Anderson was convicted of various crimes for driving under the influence of drugs (DUI) and causing a collision with another vehicle. He raises two questions on appeal. One, did the prosecutor err in closing argument by shifting the burden of proof to Anderson? Two, did the court err in imposing certain fines, fees, and assessments as part of the sentence without first holding an ability to pay hearing?

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale