In re L.H. CA 2/9
A.H. (Father) appeals from the juvenile court’s orders denying his Welfare and Institutions Code section 388 modification petition and terminating parental rights as to his daughter L.H. (§ 366.26.) He contends the juvenile court abused its discretion by denying his section 388 motion because he had shown a sufficient change of circumstances and the request was in L.H.’s best interest. He also claims the juvenile court erred in freeing L.H. for adoption because her bond with him outweighed the benefits of adoption. We affirm the orders.
Comments on In re L.H. CA 2/9