Nicholas M. v. Sup. Ct.
Petitioner filed this petition for writ of mandate to challenge that order, asserting that (1) he met his low burden of proof necessary to require an in camera review of any relevant documents; (2) the court must assume his allegations true for the purpose of the motion; (3) he did not need corroborating evidence to substantiate his allegations; and (4) the declaration filed in support of the motion was internally consistent. Court grant the petition, with directions.
Comments on Nicholas M. v. Sup. Ct.