P. v. Casey CA2/10
Defendant Pascal Casey was convicted by a jury of committing three sexual offenses during a single incident against a child for whom he was a nanny. On appeal, he contends judicial bias deprived him of his federal rights to due process and a fair trial. He also contends the fines, fees, and assessments imposed by the trial court violate his right to due process because he is unable to pay. To the extent these contentions were forfeited, he contends his counsel provided ineffective assistance. He also argues his abstract of judgment contains a clerical error.
Comments on P. v. Casey CA2/10