Grundman v. Tranik Enterprises CA2/11
This appeal concerns the sale of four luxury watches and a buyer who suffered no cognizable injury. The watches work and there was nothing wrong with the internet sales of these watches. The buyer, Channah Grundman, appeals from the order granting seller/defendants, Tranik Enterprises, Berj Kacherian, and Shant Kacherian (Tranik) summary adjudication on the first cause of action (Consumer Legal Remedies Act; Civ. Code, § 1750 et seq.), the second cause of action (Magnusson-Moss Consumer Warranty Act; 15 U.S.C. § 2301 et seq.), and the fourth cause of action (Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act; Civ. Code, § 1790 et seq.) in appellant’s first amended complaint. The trial court granted judgment on the pleadings on the third cause of action for violation of the Grey Market Goods Act (Civ. Code, § 1797.8 et seq.). We affirm.
Comments on Grundman v. Tranik Enterprises CA2/11