In re N.D. CA2/16
S.L. (mother) and M.D. (father), parents of the minor, appeal from the juvenile court’s jurisdictional and dispositional orders. (Welf. & Inst. Code, §§ 300, 395.) They assert there was insufficient evidence to sustain the allegations in the dependency petition or to support the removal order. Father further asserts that the juvenile court abused its discretion in denying his motion to represent himself in the proceedings pursuant to Faretta v. California (1975) 422 U.S. 806 [45 L.Ed.2d 562]. Father also claims the juvenile court and the San Joaquin County Human Services Agency (Agency) failed to comply with the requirements of the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) (25 U.S.C. § 1901 et seq.). Finding none of the parents’ claims have merit, we will affirm the juvenile court’s orders.
Comments on In re N.D. CA2/16