legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Santa Monica Properties v. A/R Capital
A/R Capital, LLC (A/R) appeals from the trial court's order denying its motion to vacate a judgment in favor of Santa Monica Properties (SMP) on a cross-complaint. A/R based its motion on the ground SMP was a suspended corporation which lacked the capacity to prosecute its cross action. Because A/R's challenge to the judgment on this basis came too late -- after the judgment was final -- Court affirm the trial court's order.
Appellant challenges the trial court's denial of three motions he brought after the court granted his motion for judgment on the pleadings on appellant's cross complaint: a motion for return of monies he paid as sanctions during the course of the litigation, a motion for attorney fees, and a motion for sanctions against SMP's attorney. Because none of these motions has merit, Court affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale