P. v. Cardenas
In this appeal, defendant contends that two one-year sentence enhancements that the trial court imposed pursuant to Penal Code section 667.5, subdivision (b) in effectuating a plea agreement must be stricken because the complaint did not allege, the prosecution did not prove, and he did not admit any enhancement under that section. Respondent concedes that the trial court erred in imposing two one-year sentence enhancements under section 667.5, subdivision (b), but requests that Court affirm the judgment and remand the case for resentencing rather than strike two years from defendant's sentence for those enhancements. Court affirm the judgment and remand the case for resentencing.
Comments on P. v. Cardenas