In re A.V. CA2/16
C.S., mother of A.V. and his four older half siblings, appeals from a judgment terminating her parental rights to her youngest child, A.V., on the ground the minor’s attorney had an actual conflict of interest because he represented all five siblings. In addition, mother argues that the older half siblings did not receive notice of the permanent plan hearing relating to A.V., which deprived them of their right to participate in the permanency planning hearing. We affirm.
Comments on In re A.V. CA2/16