Kroul v. WS Investment Property LLC CA2/17
In this consolidated appeal, Radka and Josef Kroul (plaintiffs) appeal from judgments of dismissal entered in favor of WS Investment Property LLC (WS) after the trial court sustained its demurrers without leave to amend to their two practically identical complaints. Plaintiffs’ claims arise out of the foreclosure of three adjoining properties they owned—their house was located on one and the other two were adjoining vacant lots. Their claims relate to the two adjoining lots. We agree with the trial court and conclude plaintiffs’ claims are barred by the doctrine of collateral estoppel. To the extent the doctrine does not apply, they also are time-barred. We affirm.
Comments on Kroul v. WS Investment Property LLC CA2/17