Marisol T. v. Super. Ct. CA2/17
Petitioner, Marisol T. (mother), challenges a juvenile court order following a permanency review hearing (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.22), wherein the court set a section 366.26 hearing and suspended her visitation after determining that continued visitation would be detrimental to her children. Mother contends that despite the specific statutes specifying the procedures for status review and permanency review hearings (§§ 366.21, 366.22), the court was required sua sponte to file an application or petition to modify its prior order granting her visitation under sections 388 and 385, and to give her notice of the application or petition. Alternatively, mother contends that the court’s order suspending visitation is not supported by sufficient evidence. Finding no error, we deny the petition.
Comments on Marisol T. v. Super. Ct. CA2/17