Nash v. Romano CA4/12
Cindy Nash sued her landlords, Pauline and Joseph Romano (the Romanos), after she broke her ankle stepping on a paver in the backyard. A jury returned a verdict in favor of the Romanos. On appeal, Nash contends the court gave an erroneous jury instruction, the evidence compelled a verdict in her favor, and the Romanos’ counsel engaged in misconduct. She also contends the court erroneously awarded the Romanos expert fees under Code of Civil Procedure section 998. We decline to consider Nash’s challenge to the expert fees because she did not file a notice of appeal of the award. Nash’s remaining arguments are either forfeited or lack merit. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment.
Comments on Nash v. Romano CA4/12