legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Danielle L.
Mother appeals from an order terminating her parental rights as to her daughters. Appellant contends the order must be reversed because (1) the court's conclusion under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26, subdivision (c)(1)(A) that the children would not benefit from a continuing relationship with her is not supported by substantial evidence and constituted an abuse of discretion, (2) the court misinterpreted section 366.26 subdivision (c)(1)(A) when ruling the children would not benefit from a continuing relationship, (3) the court abused its discretion by not considering the children's wishes before terminating her parental rights, (4) the court's conclusion that the children were adoptable is not supported by substantial evidence, (5) the court abused its discretion when it ordered adoption rather than legal guardianship as the permanent plan, and (6) she received ineffective assistance of counsel. Court reject these arguments and affirm the order terminating parental rights.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale