Sykes v. Sykes
Appellant cross appeals from an order denying her application for a residence exclusion order against cross respondent under the Domestic Violence Prevention Act (Fam. Code, S 6200 et seq.) (Act). Court affirm the order because cross respondent has sole right of possession to the residence in question under the parties' premarital agreement, and under the unusual circumstances of this case the cross appeal is essentially moot. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying the residence exclusion order.
Comments on Sykes v. Sykes