In re A.R.
Appellant, mother, appeals from a February 8, 2006, dispositional order regarding her son, born in June 2001. Mother first contends that insufficient evidence supports several of the court's factual findings which the court relied on in assuming jurisdiction over minor, and that these factual findings must therefore be vacated. Court reject this contention, because substantial evidence supports the court's assumption of jurisdiction over minor under Welfare and Institutions Code section 300, subdivision (b), and the court's other factual findings are moot for purposes of jurisdiction.
Mother further contends the court failed to make the required "no reasonable efforts" finding in denying her services for minor under section 361.5, subdivision (b)(10) and (11). Court also reject this contention, on the grounds the court implicitly made the required "no reasonable efforts" finding and substantial evidence supports the finding. Accordingly, court affirm the dispositional order regarding minor.
Comments on In re A.R.