legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Chapman
An information accused defendant of four sexual offenses against victim A.T. and four sexual offenses against victim D.B. Two of the counts involving A.T. were dismissed at the close of the prosecution case and the jury acquitted defendant of the other two counts involving A.T.
As to D.B., defendant was convicted of sexual battery of a restrained person (Pen. Code, S 243.4, subd. (a); count one), forcible oral copulation (Pen. Code, S 288a, subd. (c)(2); count two), forcible rape (Pen. Code, S 261, subd. (a)(2); count three), and kidnapping (Pen. Code, S 207; count four) as a lesser included offense of kidnapping for rape (Pen. Code, S 209, subd. (b)(1)). On counts two and three, the jury found that defendant kidnapped D.B. within the meaning of Penal Code section 667.61, subdivision (d)(2).
Defendant was sentenced to state prison for six years for oral copulation plus consecutive terms of one year for sexual battery and 25 years to life for rape. Sentence for kidnapping was stayed pursuant to Penal Code section 654.
On appeal, defendant contends the trial court erred by (1) admitting evidence of uncharged prior acts pursuant to Evidence Code sections 1108 and 1101, and (2) instructing the jury with CALJIC No. 2.50.01, which violates the constitutional requirement of proof beyond a reasonable doubt. Court affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale