legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Rodriguez CA5
Defendant Juan Eulogio Rodriguez pled guilty to felony possession of marijuana in a prison in violation of Penal Code section 4573.6. He later petitioned for resentencing or dismissal of his conviction pursuant to section 11361.8 of the Health and Safety Code and Proposition 64, contending that the offense had been decriminalized because he possessed less than 28.5 grams of marijuana not in the form of concentrated cannabis. The trial court recognized that California Courts of Appeal have split on the issue. (Compare People v. Perry (2019) 32 Cal.App.5th 885 (Perry) [Proposition 64 did not decriminalize possession of cannabis in prison], review denied June 12, 2019, S255148 with People v. Raybon (2019) 36 Cal.App.5th 111 (Raybon) [Proposition 64 decriminalized possession of less than 28.5 grams of marijuana in prison], review granted Aug. 21, 2019, S256978.) The trial court agreed with Perry and denied his motion. Defendant contends that was error. We agree with the trial court and we

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale