In re T.V.
Mother contends that the trial court failed to employ procedures comporting with due process when it appointed a guardian ad litem for her, and that such error mandates reversal of the court's order appointing a guardian ad litem and all subsequent orders, including the order terminating parental rights. Mother further contends that substantial evidence did not support the trial court's finding that the beneficial relationship exception set forth in Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26, subdivision (c)(1)(A) did not apply.
Comments on In re T.V.