In re Jasmine G.
Father appeals from juvenile court orders denying his petition for modification of certain orders regarding his children Jasmine, Priscilla and Jaime, Jr., and terminating parental rights as to Jasmine, freeing her for adoption.
Father contends that: (1) the dependency court erred by not setting a contested Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26 hearing on whether father could prove a parental relationship exception to the termination of parental rights under section 366.26, subdivision (c)(1)(A); (2) the court should have sustained a sibling relationship exception under section 366.26, subdivision (c)(1)(E); (3) the court erred in not setting a hearing on his petition for modification under section 388; and (4) father did not receive proper notice of the section 366.26 hearing. Court disagree and affirm.
Comments on In re Jasmine G.