legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Randle v. Cenlar F.S.B. CA2/4
Plaintiff Otto Randle appeals from a judgment of dismissal entered in a lawsuit he brought against an individual, Rita Gayle Farris-Ellison, and three entities, Cenlar F.S.B. d/b/a Central Loan Administration and Reporting (Cenlar), Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (MERS), and the Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae). The judgment at issue was entered in favor of the three entities after the trial court granted their motion for judgment on the pleadings. We conclude the court did not err in entering judgment in favor of the entities because the statutes of limitation had run and Randle failed to allege (and appears unable to allege) facts sufficient to support application of the discovery rule. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale