In re J.H. CA4/3
C.A. (Mother) appeals from the juvenile court’s orders terminating her parental rights as to now eight year old Jon.G., six year old Joh.G., six year old Ja.G., four year old Ja.H., and two year old Je.H. pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26. (All further statutory references are to the Welfare and Institutions Code, unless otherwise specified.) She contends the juvenile court erred by finding inapplicable the parent child relationship exception under section 366.26, subdivision (c)(1)(B)(i) and by failing to select legal guardianship as the permanent plan for the children.
R.H., who is the father of Ja.H. and Je.H., and J.G., who is the father of Jon.G., Joh.G., and Ja.G., have each appealed from the orders terminating parental rights. In their respective appellate briefs, R.H. and J.G. each state they do not raise any separate appellate issues but instead join and adopt Mother’s opening brief and argue that if Mother’s parental rights are reinstated, their
Comments on In re J.H. CA4/3