In re I.A. CA4/3
This juvenile dependency case arose after Sherry B. (Mother) absconded with her young daughter, I.A., allegedly to protect the child from suspected sexual abuse by her presumed father, Jorge S.-A. (Father). The juvenile court sustained the dependency petition and vested custody of I.A. with her paternal grandmother. Reunification services were provided, and I.A. eventually was returned to Father’s custody, with Mother having monitored visitation. In the months that followed, Mother received ongoing enhancement services. The court later terminated jurisdiction and issued exit orders which granted sole physical and legal custody of I.A. to Father and supervised visitation to Mother.
Mother appeals from the exit orders. She asserts she was not provided reasonable services, the exit orders are arbitrary and not sufficiently specific, and the court violated the inquiry and notice requirements of the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) (25 U.S.C § 1901 et seq.). We reject these contentions an
Comments on In re I.A. CA4/3