legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Moore CA1/3
Defendant Lonnel Moore appeals after a jury convicted him of human trafficking of a minor (Pen. Code, § 236.1, subd. (c)), soliciting a child under the age of 16 to prostitute (§ 266h, subd. (b)), inducing a child to engage in a lewd act (§ 266j), and committing a lewd act upon a child (§ 288, subd. (c)(1)). His sole contention on appeal is that substantial evidence did not support the jury’s special allegation finding that the trafficking involved force, fear, fraud, deceit, coercion, violence, duress, menace, or threat of unlawful injury. (§ 236.1, subd. (c)(2).) We affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale