P. v. Latscha CA2/1
In this second appeal, defendant Rudy Latscha challenges the judgment following his resentencing. He argues we must reverse the judgment because (1) the trial court did not order a new probation report prior to the resentencing hearing; (2) the trial court misunderstood the extent of its discretion when it declined to strike two firearm enhancements or impose lesser enhancements; and (3) the trial court failed to comply with this court’s remand order concerning the assessment of fines and fees. As set forth below, we disagree. Defendant, however, is correct that the abstract of judgment must be modified to reflect properly his custody credits and local conduct credit. We order the abstract of judgment to be modified and otherwise affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Latscha CA2/1