In re R.V. CA5
Appellants Marco V. (father) and T.B. (mother) appealed from the juvenile court’s order terminating their parental rights (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.26) as to their now 20 month-old daughter, R.V. After reviewing the juvenile court record, the parents’ court appointed counsel informed this court they could find no arguable issues to raise on the parents’ behalf. This court granted the parents leave to personally file a letter setting forth a good cause showing that an arguable issue of reversible error exists. (In re Phoenix H. (2009) 47 Cal.4th 835, 844.)
Appellants filed letters but failed to address the termination findings or orders or set forth a good cause showing that any arguable issue of reversible error arose from the section 366.26 hearing. (In re Phoenix H., supra, 47 Cal.4th at p. 844.) Consequently, we dismiss the appeal.
Comments on In re R.V. CA5