legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re T.D. CA2/2
Appellant Henry L., the noncustodial presumed father of dependent child T.D., appeals the juvenile court’s denial of his request to move T.D. to Arizona under the Interstate Compact on the Placement of Children (ICPC). (Fam. Code, § 7900 et seq.) The court found that T.D. is likely to reunify with his custodial parent, E.D. (Mother), and moving T.D. from California would prevent reunification. Moreover, the record does not show that a relative requested placement of T.D. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 361.3, subd. (a).) We see no abuse of discretion and affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale